When we left off in Part 1, we promised to examine how select Global Tactical Asset Allocation products stack up against the Global Market Portfolio from the perspective of several performance measures – particularly Sharpe ratio, alpha and information ratio. Without further adieu:
First, note that we will soon be going to press with a new paper, entitled “Tactical Alpha: A Quantitative Case for Active Asset Allocation”. Here is the abstract for the paper:
We recently posted a piece on factor investing (here) so we were thrilled to have an opportunity to see Dr. Andrew Ang and Don Raymond discuss factor investing at a seminar in Toronto last week. Dr. Ang is Ann F. Kaplan Professor of Business and Chair of the Finance and Economics Division at Columbia Business School, while Dr. Raymond is Adjunct Professor of Finance and past Chair of the International Centre for Pension Management at University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Business. We should note that Dr. Raymond is also the former Chief Investment Strategist for the $220 billion Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB). Don’s work on factor investing goes back more than a decade at the CPPIB, and Dr. Ang has literally written the book on factor investing with his 736 page Asset Management: A Systematic Approach to Factor Investing. Perhaps not surprisingly, Dr. Raymond uses Dr. Ang’s book as a core text for his courses at Rotman.
The Miller Thompson / Reuters monthly Taxes and Wealth Management newsletter carried an article we authored on the importance of volatility and path dependency (a.k.a sequence of returns risk) for retirees. We are pleased to have been selected for publication, and hope that readers find value in our contribution.
We just love a good debate, and there seems to be quite a heated debate at the moment about the relative utility of passive versus active investing. Perhaps this debate is as timeless as investment management itself, but a flurry of recent studies may have finally armed passive advocates with enough ammunition to settle the argument once and for all.